Clinical Trial
Experimental layout
Results
The averages were statistically similar (p=0.21) Weight gaining Treatment Group and Control Group Experimental Group By the end of this trial the average weight gain shows an increase of 44% for the treatment group compared to the control group.
Despite of poor quality pastures, daily weight gain was 0,482 kg in the Treatment Group compared to the Control Group which reached an average daily weight gain of 0,334 kg. An increase of the voluntary food intake can be attributed to energy, vitamin and protein contribution of Modivitasan, due voluntary intake and digestibility respond to protein and energetic supply when pastures contain less than 8 to 10% of crude protein, which is the case of the pastures used for this trial (Allison, 1985; Del Curto et al., 1990). Weight gain comparison Study On the other hand, it must be emphasized that the obtained weight gain has a positive effect over breeder's economy according to a simple economic analysis. Considering a treatment of Modivitasan for 3 PEN (1.10 USD aprox.) per animal for each injection, the sale price of 4 PEN (1.5 USD aprox.) per kg of body weight and; 43.4 kg and 30,1 kg as the weight gain average for the treatment group and control group respectively, we have a 44.2 PEN (16.10 USD aprox.) net prot with the use of Modivitasan (Picture 2). Economic gain per animal by using Modivitasan Study
References
2. Chicco F, Plasse D, Bodisco V. 1977. Reproducción del ganado bovino en Venezuela. Agronomía Tropical. 27(3): 357-386.
3. DelCurto T, Cochran R, Harmon D, Beharca A, Jaques K, Towne G, Vanzant E. 1990. Supplementation of dormant tallgrass prairie forage:
I. Influence varying supplemental protein and (or) energy levels on forage utilization characteristics of beef steers in connement. J. Anim. Sci.,
68: 515-531.
4. NRC (National Reserach Council). 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Rev. Ed. National Academy. Press, Washington, DC. 381p.
5.Garmendia J. 2006. Los minerales en la Reproducción Bovina. Disponible en: http://www.avpa.ula.ve/ docuPDFs/xcongreso/minerales.pdf (consultado 6- 02-2010).
6. Durán E, Calvo C, Díaz R, Sánchez V. 2005. Rentabilidad comparativa entre el pastoreo tradicional y el pastoreo intensivo tecnificado en el trópico seco de Oaxaca. UABJO-EMVZ. En:
http://www.infolizer.com/1ammv5eb2a1n5et/Rentabilidad-comparativa-entre-el-pastoreotradicional-
y-el-.html
7. Rodríguez SLM. 1989. Estudio de la eficiencia del acetato de trembolona 17B estradiollactosa,
Acetato de trembolona 17 Bestradiol-colesterol, benzoato de estradiol más
progesterona y zeranol sobre la ganancia de peso en novillo en pastoreo con
complementación. Tesis de licenciatura. México DF: Fac. Med. Vet y Zoot. U.N.A.M. 89p.
Organic Modifier: Modivitasan
View more presentations from Agrovet Market